Thursday, September 11, 2008

ACTION!! Urgent- contact Don Fowler AGAIN!

Urgent- contact Don Fowler AGAIN- don@fowlercommunications.com

Don Fowler who recently grew tired of the citizens of this country is now Pimping off his Wife Carol. She is out attacking Sarah Palin saying her only qualification to run for office is that she did not abort her baby. I wonder what qualifies her to speak for the rest of us women. She certainly does not speak for me - in fact she is a disgrace - I want not association with. She should immediately be removed as a representative. She has stepped over the line of human decency.

That is about the sickest and lowest these two sharks have stooped to. And these men who are now hiding behind their wives skirts - who are sending their dutiful subservient wives have certainly married their equals who are gladly berating other women like mud wrestlers for the delight of their husbands. What a disgrace!

Since Don has this much control over his mindless wife send him an email to let him know what we think of this less that dynamic duo. don@fowlercommunications.com

 Please note - His wife serves as democrat chairwoman. This is change I can do without- It is time to be outraged with this party and this sexism- it is an outrageous, unacceptable form of assault on women - it is a human rights violation.

  *************************************************************************
This is a great read - it also explains how this a lot


                            How Obama lost the election
                                    By Spengler


DENVER - Senator Barack Obama's acceptance speech last week seemed vastly different from the stands of this city's Invesco Stadium than it did to the 40 million who saw it on television. Melancholy hung like thick smog over the reserved seats where I sat with Democratic Party staffers. The crowd, of course, cheered mechanically at the tag lines, flourished placards, and even rose for the obligatory wave around the stadium. But its mood was sour. The air carried the acrid smell of defeat, and the crowd took shallow breaths. Even the appearance of R&B great Stevie Wonder failed to get the blood pumping.

The speech itself dragged on for three-quarters of an hour. As David S Broder wrote in the Washington Post: "[Obama's] recital of a long list of domestic promises could have been delivered by


any Democratic nominee from Walter Mondale to John Kerry. There was no theme music to the speech and really no phrase or sentence that is likely to linger in the memory of any listener. The thing I never expected did in fact occur: Al Gore, the famously wooden former vice president, gave a more lively and convincing speech than Obama did."

On television, Obama's spectacle might have looked like The Ten Commandments, but inside the stadium it felt like Night of the Living Dead. The longer the candidate spoke, and the more money he promised to spend on alternative energy, preschool education, universal health care, and other components of the Democratic pinata, the lower the party professionals slouched into their seats. The professionals I sat with were Hillary Clinton people, to be sure, and had reason to sulk, for an Obama victory might do them little good in any event.

The Democrats were watching the brightest and most articulate presidential candidate they have fielded since John F Kennedy snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. And this was before John McCain, in a maneuver worthy of Admiral Chester Nimitz at the Battle of Midway, turned tables on the Democrats' strategy with the choice of Alaska governor Sarah Palin as his running mate.

Speaking to Obama supporters on the periphery of the big event, I was startled by the rapturous devotion elicited by the junior senator from Illinois. He is no symbol for identity politics, no sacrifice on the altar of white guilt, but the most gifted persuader of individuals that I have encountered in any country's politics, as well as a powerful orator on the grand stage. This is not a crowd phenomenon nor a fad, but the response of hundreds of people to an individual.

I sat in on a session with three leaders of Veterans for Obama, a group of retired young officers who had served in Iraq and Afghanistan, courtesy of the New Republic's writer on the scene, David Samuels. With passion and enthusiasm, these young people spoke of their hopes for nation-building in Iraq. The George W Bush administration should have put twice the resources into the beleaguered country, they harangued me - not just soldiers, but agronomists, traffic cops, lawyers, judges, and physicians. The Department of Agriculture should have mobilized, along with the Department of Justice.

Nation-building? Doubling down on the US commitment to Iraq? Isn't that trying to out-Bush the Bush administration, while Obama campaigned on getting out of Iraq and spending the money on programs at home? Unblinking, one of the soldiers said, "That's what we think Barack will do." They believed in a more expensive version of the administration's program, and faulted Bush for half measures - and somehow they believed that Obama really agreed with them, all the public evidence to the contrary. And they believed in Barack with perfect faith.

Gandalf's warnings about the irresistible voice of the wizard Saruman in J R R Tolkien's Lord of the Rings come to mind. If these battle-hardened veterans of America's wars fell so easily under the spell of Obama's voice, who can withstand it? Obama's persuasive powers, though, are strongest when channeled through the empathy of his interlocutor. Everyone believes that Obama feels his pain, shares his dream, and will fight his fight and heal his ills. But that is everyone as an individual. Add all the individuals up into a campaign platform, and it turns into three-quarters of an hour worth of promises that echo all the ghosts of conventions past.

Obama will spend the rest of his life wondering why he rejected the obvious road to victory, that is, choosing Hillary Clinton as his vice presidential nominee. However reluctantly, Clinton would have had to accept. McCain's choice of vice presidential candidate made obvious after the fact what the party professionals felt in their fingertips at the stadium extravaganza yesterday: rejecting Clinton in favor of the colorless, unpopular, tangle-tongued Washington perennial Joe Biden was a statement of weakness. McCain's selection was a statement of strength. America's voters will forgive many things in a politician, including sexual misconduct, but they will not forgive weakness.

That is why McCain will win in November, and by a landslide, barring some unforeseen event. Obama is the most talented and persuasive politician of his generation, the intellectual superior of all his competitors, but a fatally insecure personality. American voters are not intellectual, but they are shrewd, like animals. They can smell insecurity, and the convention stank of it. Obama's prospective defeat is entirely of its own making. No one is more surprised than Republican strategists, who were convinced just weeks ago that a weakening economy ensured a Democratic victory.

Biden, who won 3% of the popular vote in the Democratic presidential primary in his home state of Delaware, and 1% or less in every other contest he entered, is ballot-box poison. Obama evidently chose him to assuage critics who point to his lack of foreign policy credentials. That was a deadly error, for by appearing to concede the critics' claim that he knows little about foreign policy, Obama raised questions about whether he is qualified to be president in the first place. He had a winning alternative, which was to pick Clinton. That would have sent a double message: first, that Obama is tough enough to make the slippery Clintons into his subordinates, and second, that he is generous enough to extend a hand to his toughest adversary in the cause of unity.

Why didn't Obama choose Hillary? The most credible explanation came from veteran columnist Robert Novak May 10, who reports that Michelle Obama vetoed Hillary's candidacy. "The Democratic front-runner's wife did not comment on other rival candidates for the party's nomination, but she has been sniping at Clinton since last summer. According to Obama sources, those public utterances do not reveal the extent of her hostility," Novak wrote. If that is true, then Obama succumbed to the character weakness I described in a February 26 profile of (Obama's women reveal his secret). His peculiar dependency on an assertive and often rancorous spouse, I argued, made him vulnerable, and predicted that Obama "will destroy himself before he destroys the country".

Alternately, Obama might have chosen a rising Democratic star like Virginia's 50-year-old governor Tim Kaine. A weaker choice than Hillary, Kaine (or someone like him) would have made a bold statement of self-confidence. Obama could have said with credibility that he would bring to Washington a new generation of outsiders who would change the old system. Instead, Obama saddled an old and unpopular Washington warhorse.

Curiously, Obama ignored the rising stars of his own party, offering the prime time speaking slots to familiar faces, including Senator Edward Kennedy and Bill and Hillary Clinton, as well as his own wife, the first prospective First Lady to take the keynote spot in the history of American party conventions.

McCain doesn't have a tenth of Obama's synaptic fire-power, but he is a nasty old sailor who knows when to come about for a broadside. Given Obama's defensive, even wimpy selection of a running-mate, McCain's choice was obvious. He picked the available candidate most like himself: a maverick with impeccable reform credentials, a risk-seeking commercial fisherwoman and huntress married to a marathon snowmobile racer who carries a steelworkers union card. The Democratic order of battle was to tie McCain to the Bush administration and attack McCain by attacking Bush. With Palin on the ticket, McCain has re-emerged as the maverick he really is.

The young Alaskan governor, to be sure, hasn't any business running for vice president of the United States with her thin resume. McCain and his people know this perfectly well, and that is precisely why they put her on the ticket. If Palin is unqualified to be vice president, all the less so is Obama qualified to be president.

McCain has certified his authenticity for the voters. He's now the outsider, the reformer, the maverick, the war hero running next to the Alaskan amazon with a union steelworker spouse. Obama, who styled himself an agent of change, took his image for granted, and attempted to ensure himself victory by doing the cautious thing. He is trapped in a losing position, and there is nothing he can do to get out of it.

Obama, in short, is long on brains and short on guts. A Shibboleth of American politics holds that different tactics are required to win the party primaries as opposed to the general election, that is, by pandering to fringe groups with disproportionate influence in the primaries. But Obama did not compromise himself with extreme positions. He did not have to, for younger voters who greeted him with near-religious fervor did not require that he take any position other than his promise to change everything. Obama could have allied with the old guard, through an Obama-Clinton ticket, or he could have rejected the old guard by choosing the closest thing the Democrats had to a Sarah Palin. But fear paralyzed him, and he did neither.

In my February 26 profile, I called Obama "the political equivalent of a sociopath", without any derogatory intent. A sociopath seeks the empathy of all around him while empathizing with no one. Obama has an almost magical ability to gain the confidence of those around him. Perhaps it was the adaptation of a bright and sensitive young boy who was abandoned by three parents - his Kenyan father Barack Obama Sr, who left his pregnant young bride; his Indonesian stepfather Lolo Soetero; and by his mother, Ann Dunham, who sent 10-year-old Obama to live with her parents while she pursued her career as an anthropologist.

Combine a child's response to serial abandonment with the perspective of an outsider, and Obama became an alien species against which American politics had no natural defenses. He is a Third World anthropologist profiling Americans, in but not of the American system. No country's politics depends more openly on friendships than America's, yet Obama has not a single real friend, for he rose so fast that all his acquaintances become rungs on the ladder of his ascent. One human relationship crowds the others out of his life, his marriage to Michelle, a strong, assertive and very angry woman.

If Novak's report is accurate, then Michelle's anger will have lost the election for Obama, as Achilles' anger nearly killed the Greek cause in the Trojan War. But the responsibility rests not with Michelle, but with Obama. Obama's failure of nerve at the cusp of his success is consistent with my profile of the candidate, in which I predicted that he would self-destruct. It's happening faster than I expected. As I wrote last February:
It is conceivable that Barack Obama, if elected, will destroy himself before he destroys the country. Hatred is a toxic diet even for someone with as strong a stomach as Obama ... Both Obama and the American public should be very careful of what they wish for. As the horrible example of Obama's father shows, there is nothing worse for an embittered outsider manipulating the system from within than to achieve his goals.
By all rights, the Democrats should win this election. They will lose, I predict, because of the flawed character of their candidate.

Clinton Dem Action Alert! 11SEP08

Calling all Clinton Dems!

Hillary will be attending a reception for Sheila Jackson Lee on September 21st in Houston Texas and they need your help! This is no ordinary fundraiser...

There appears to be an all out effort on to oust representatives that supported Hillary from their congressional seats. Sheila is one of them.

Big money players are supporting Sheila's opponent and really putting the heat on. The "politics of personal destruction" is their game. The smear campaign is in full swing.

Sheila stood with Hillary though her entire primary run and received threats, intimidation and namecalling just for supporting her. This kind of behavior can not be rewarded! Please come to her defense by attending this Houston fundraiser.

If you can't be there, please consider donating to her campaign.

JOIN HILLARY IN HOUSTON, SEPT 21, 1.30 PM

Invitation (Please RSVP):

www.sheilajacksonlee18.com

In the Message box, please type "HOST: ANN MacNAUGHTON".

Donate To Shiela Jackson Lee's Campaign

It is important that Hillary keeps as many of her friends as possible in office to help carry out her work for the American people...us!

Please support Sheila if you can.

Pam
Clinton Dems


Keep Fighting!

"Without courage you cannot practice any of the other virtues."


~ Maya Angelou

Monday, July 28, 2008

Video List

__________________________________

Hillary Clinton - rising above sexism & misogyny

Hillary Clinton: Mad As Hell/Bitch:

Obama visited 57 states, says McCain losing his bearings

Obama Claims He's Visited 57 States

Double Talker and Liar Barack Obama Flip Flops On Iran

Obama Thinks We Have 57 States | Bonus Video -Tornado

Barack Obama - Dumber than Dumb - Gaffe Mania

Obama gaffe - cost

Obama gaffe on "breathalizer"

Yes Or No? Obama stumbles

Obama's Memorial Day Gaffe, Caught Lying About His Uncle

Obama 2+2=5

Obama Claims No One Clapped During Detroit, MI Speech

Slew of Gaffes Obama on Fox News

Obama's flip-flop on running and the iraq warL

Obama VS. Robert Gibbs on the surge

Obama on Iran - Threat, or not?

The Game of Expedience:

Obama Just words - just speeches - just think

Obama on Lobbiest bill

Obama on the Race Card

Obama on his dad and the flag?:

Barack Obama Sees Dead People

Obama's Memorial Day Gaffe

Obama in Sunrise

Barack Obama rally in Sioux Falls

Obama on Rezko

Obama Gets Afghanistan Language Wrong

A video portrait of Obama

SHOCKING Obama words: what he really thinks of white folks


Clinton Supporter Thrown Out of Rules Committee Meeting

Hillary Clinton: Mad As Hell/Bitch

DNC: Fractured Fairy Tales

DNC Rules & Bylaws Protest 1

Clinton Supporter Ejected From DNC Meeting Shows Bruises

Obama give Hillary the "finger"?

Obama Whines Then Refuses To Debate Anymore! PA

Hillary Kicked Obama's Ass In PA Debate

If Obama is the Nominee This is What We Will See

Michelle Obama's

Shocking Comments from Barack Obama's wife!!

Barack Obama Makes Shocking confession!!

_________________________________

Saturday, July 26, 2008

Share with Prodcers and Executives Examples of Sexism in the Media

Thank you to everyone on our WMC Action Team who participated in our
campaign "Sexism Sells, But We're Not Buying It." Through your
efforts, the WMC has generated more than 200,000 views of our "Sexism
Sells" video and more than 6,800 signatures for our very first
petition campaign! Your efforts are sending a powerful message to
media executives that the era when media sexism would be tolerated or
seen as a joke is over.

Over the next several weeks, I will be meeting and speaking with the
executives responsible for the sexist language and behavior that we
exposed through "Sexism Sells." And so I'm asking for your help again.
Please take a moment to visit our Web site, the Majority Post, and
write us a message to share with the producers and executives who have
allowed this behavior to go on for far too long.

Some members of the media, including The New York Times, have tried to
dismiss complaints about media sexism as being specific to Hillary
Clinton, or not a big deal. But we know that sexism is never about one
women. When these comments or jokes are made in the media, they demean
all women, and weaken the media which is a crucial part of our
democracy.

And when one woman exits the stage, you can bet that the "bad boys" of
media will find another target. Already, Michelle Obama and Cindy
McCain are feeling the heat of the national media stage. That's why
we've launched the new WMC Sexism Watch, an online form where you can
help us track instances of media sexism.

As part of the WMC Action Team, we're counting on you. Please bookmark
http://www.womensmediacenter.com/sexism_watch.html. When you see
something that needs a response, fill out the form and help our staff
fight back against media sexism.

Thank you for your support.

Sincerely,

Carol Jenkins



PS - We know that you value our fight for women in the media. Please
make a donation today to ensure that The Women's Media Center can
continue our fight to make women visible and powerful in the media.

About us:
The Women's Media Center strives to make women visible and powerful in
the media. From our founding in 2005 by Jane Fonda, Robin Morgan, and
Gloria Steinem to our advocacy and media relations work today, we are
part of a strong feminist tradition that seeks to hold the media
accountable for presenting the world as we know it. Our mission is to
ensure that women and women's experiences are reflected in the media
just as women are present everywhere in the real world; that women are
represented as local, national, and global sources for and subjects of
the media; and that women media professionals have equal opportunities
for employment and advancement. In addition to the WMC founders,
current board members include Loreen Arbus, Cristina Azocar, Jodie
Evans, Gloria Feldt, Carol Jenkins, Teresa McBride, Pat Mitchell,
Jessica Neuwirth, Rossana Rosado, and Helen Zia. For more information,
please visit www.womensmediacenter.com.

NO DEAL / PUMA in WASHINGTON STATE: Stop The Silence On Gender Bias and Sexism!

NO DEAL / PUMA in WASHINGTON STATE: Stop The Silence On Gender Bias and Sexism!

Washington State Delegate Contact Information

For any corrections or changes, please email pumainwa@gmail.com

Elected Officials:
Rep. Rick Larsen (2nd District)
Rep. Brian Baird (3rd District)
Rep. Norm Dicks (6th District)
Rep. Jay Inslee (WA)
Rep. Jim McDermott (7th District)
Rep. Adam Smith (WA)
Gov. Chris Gregoire
Sen. Maria Cantwell (WA)
Sen. Patty Murray (WA)


Democratic National Committee Members:
Dwight Pelz - WA Democratic Party Chair
Eileen Macoll - WA Vice Chair
Ed Cote (coed@pacifier.com)
Sharon Mast (skmast@att.net)
David McDonald (davidm@prestongates.com)
Pat Noter WA DNC Member
Former Speaker Tom Foley (WA)
Ron Sims (WA)

*Victor Collymore
Add-on

*(source: wikipedia )

An Outrageous Attempt by the Bush Administration to Undermine Women's Rights

The Bush administration is up to its old tricks again, quietly putting ideology before science and women's health. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services is poised to put in place new barriers to accessing common forms of contraception like birth control pills, emergency contraception and IUDs by labeling them "abortion." These proposed regulations set to be released next week will allow healthcare providers to refuse to provide contraception to women who need it. We can't let them get away with this underhanded move to undermine women's health and that's why I am sounding the alarm.

These rules pose a serious threat to providers and uninsured and low-income Americans seeking care. They could prevent providers of federally-funded family planning services, like Medicaid and Title X, from guaranteeing their patients access to the full range of comprehensive family planning services. They'll also build significant barriers to counseling, education, contraception and preventive health services for those who need it most: low-income and uninsured women and men.

The regulations could even invalidate state laws that currently ensure access to contraception for many Americans. In fact, they describe New York and California's laws requiring prescription drug insurance plans to provide coverage for contraceptives as part of "the problem." These rules would even interfere with New York State law that ensures survivors of sexual assault and rape receive emergency contraception in hospital emergency rooms.

We've seen this kind of ideologically driven move from the Bush administration before. Senator Patty Murray and I went toe to toe with the Bush administration to demand a decision on Plan B by the FDA. We won that fight and we need to win this one too.

When I learned about these proposed rules, I immediately joined with Senator Murray to call on the Bush administration to stop these dangerous plans. I am joining with New York family planning and healthcare advocates to spread the word. Now is the time to raise our voices. I will continue to press HHS and I hope you will join me. I have posted information on how to get involved here (http://www.hillpac.com/action/hhspetition).

SOURCE: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/hillary-clinton/an-outrageous-attempt-by_b_114064.html